William Golding, who penned “Thinking as a Hobby” discussed and elaborated on the fact that were three basic evaluations to critical thinking or thinking, in general. He stated and described these three kinds or “grades” of thinking starting with grade three which he described as loaded with “prejudice, hypocrisy and ignorance” (Golding, 2004).
He goes ahead to say that he has segregated the populace into three classifications based on the way they think namely grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3. He also accepts that a greater part of the population can be represented as grade 3 thinkers (Sullivan & Charles,2005). If one chooses to pioneer the utilization of the rest of the population for creating chaos, he/she can possibly succeed in doing so due to the lack of ability to distinguish truth from the lies and reality over illusions by the grade 3 group.
He further moves on to describe the grade 2 thinkers, who according to him are less impacted by one driving force. He accepted that these evaluations of populace could distinguish debasement and inquiry the sincerely of religion or foundation yet are blinded by these thoughts that truly obstructs this a piece of the populace from discovering new standards to consider in (Johnstone & Barbara,1997). The remaining populace incorporates grade-one masterminds who see debasement and viciousness as well as looks for truth. Their specific lives are surrounded by excellence, shrewdness and information (Corbett, 2004). This populace shows characteristics of excellence, innovativeness and creative energy like Einstein and thinkers including Heraclites and Aristotle opening the overall public to music, workmanship and science.