論文代寫價錢：Euthyphro困境

論文代寫價錢：Euthyphro困境
Euthyphro困境可以被理解的一般討論,蘇格拉底和Euthyphro之間發生。 Euthyphro即將判決他的父親,在這種背景下,討論男人的虔誠的性質被帶入上下文。 Euthyphro要起訴他的父親。 Euthyphro禮物,有一個神聖的原因他的行動和他的家人不能理解這個神聖的干預行動。蘇格拉底問他這著名的問題”是神的虔誠的愛,因為它是虔誠,還是虔誠的,因為它是愛的神嗎?”(1966年吉奇,p.70)。這是Euthyphro困境。描述將有助於更好地理解Euthyphro困境。這裡的問題是,上帝命令一個特定的行動,因為它在道德上是正確的。或者,相反的觀點是,一個動作在道德上是正確的,只是因為神所吩咐的。前者假定上帝一樣不是道德權利的起源神的誡命的理論前提。後者假設道德權利只存在,因為神(上帝是原始點)。如果是後者根據神的命令是正確的理論,然後像仇恨和毀滅可以被認為是僅僅因為神所吩咐的。

論文代寫價錢：Euthyphro困境
Euthyphro的困境是用來呈現類似的神聖命令理論的困境。假設上帝不是道德行為的起源,上帝和道德行為之間的聯繫被切斷的理解神的命令理論。上帝不再是法律製造商,而是人理解我們內心的美德是對與錯。根據Euthyphro困境,如果我們明白上帝只是一個識別器的道德權利,那麼這將意味著上帝不是道德的起源,和這意味著神聖的命令理論實際上是非常核心的挑戰。現在其他角度Euthyphro困境是理解所有操作如上所述的上帝在道德上是正確的。因為人們的行為在上帝的指引下,它可能會說,他們的行為是由上帝。現在這裡介紹的困境是:如果有人做了錯事並且導致傷害的人,因為神要他們這樣做,他們可以被稱為是道德上正確的。這是不正確的,因為道德教導人們不要傷害別人。再次Euthyphro困境可以理解上下文的神聖命令的理論。

論文代寫價錢：Euthyphro困境

The Euthyphro’s Dilemma can be understood in general from the discussion that takes place between Socrates and Euthyphro. Euthyphro is about to sentence his father and in this context, a discussion on the pious nature of men is brought into context. Euthyphro is going to prosecute his father. Euthyphro presents that there is a divine reason for his action and that his family is not able to understand this divine intervention in action. Here Socrates asks him this famous question “Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” (Geach, 1966, p.70). This is the Euthyphro dilemma. A rephrasing will help to understand the Euthyphro dilemma better. The question asked here is whether God commands a particular action because it is morally right. Alternatively, the opposite viewpoint would be that an action is morally right only because God has commanded it. The former assumes God as not the origination for moral rights as the divine commandment theory presupposes. The latter assumes that moral rights only exist because of God (God is the originating point). If the latter was true according to the divine command theory, then something like hate and destruction could be considered right just because God has commanded it.

論文代寫價錢：Euthyphro困境
Euthyphro’s dilemma is used to present a similar dilemma for Divine Command Theory. Supposing that God is not the origination of moral actions, the connection between God and moral actions is severed as understood in the Divine command theory. God is no longer the law maker, but instead is someone who understands virtues within us as being right and wrong. According to the Euthyphro dilemma, if we understand God as just a recognizer of moral rights, then it would mean that God is not the origination for the morals, and this means that the divine command theory is actually challenged at its very core. Now the other stand point in Euthyphro dilemma is understanding all actions as stated by God to be morally right. Since people do actions guided by God, it could be said that their actions are dictated by God. Now the dilemma introduced here is this: if someone does something wrong and which results in harm to people, because God wanted them to do so, then can they be called as being morally right. This is incorrect, because morals teach people not to harm others. Once again, the Euthyphro dilemma can be understood in the context of the divine command theory.