美国 essay 代 写:烟草游说团体

美国 essay 代 写:烟草游说团体

烟草游说团体可能不仅是英国,而且是世界上最强大的游说团体。它们不仅是大多数国家最大的税收来源,而且由于它们的跨境存在而具有影响力。没有这样的国家能够宣称自己不受烟草游说团体的影响(Team- Global Issues, 2014)。在这种情况下,大多数政客和政府倾向于采取不伤害这个有影响力的群体的措施。联合王国政府有两个议院,即下议院和上议院。这两个机构的成员都与许多烟草公司有不同的联系。这可能是通过慷慨的捐赠给他们的竞选基金或慈善机构,这些组织接近立法机构的核心,或者通过各种各样的商业交易。不管影响的程度和程度如何,烟草游说团体可以控制大量的立法(Team- Global Issues, 2014)。具有很高的管理和政府技能;决策策略决策是动态环境中唯一的优势或劣势。这一决定需要资源投入,也将产生不易预测的长期后果。

美国 essay 代 写:烟草游说团体

冲突的战略目标只会增加与这个层次的决策相关的风险(Eisenhardt & Zbaracki, 1992) (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997)。禁止烟草和烟草产品的促销将通过对烟草产品征税来影响收入。虽然现有用户将继续支付产品费用,但由于老用户死亡而造成的损失不会由新用户开始使用该产品而得到补偿(Cain, 2014)。对这种情况熟视无睹将对公共卫生机制造成损害,越来越多的人因各种烟草相关原因而患病。这包括癌症(喉咙、肺、嘴等)、哮喘、呼吸问题等等。禁止烟草和烟草制品的促销将影响这些产品的预期销售增长。这反过来又会影响到政治家推动的战争资金和社会事业的可得性。两者都将耗尽,立法机构将不得不从其他地方寻找未来的资金。如果他们与烟草游说团体的成员有共同的商业利益,那么他们也将不得不承担巨大的经济损失。

美国 essay 代 写:烟草游说团体

The tobacco lobby is perhaps the strongest lobbying body not just in the United Kingdom but across the world. They not only are the biggest tax generators for most countries, but are also influential due to their cross border presence. There is no such country which can claim to be free from then influence of the tobacco lobby (Team- Global Issues, 2014). In such a scenario, most politicians and governments tend to adopt measures that do not harm this influential group.The United Kingdom government has two houses, viz., the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The members of both these houses are associated with many of the tobacco companies in different ways. It could be through generous donations to their campaign chest or charitable organisations that are close to the heart of the legislatures,or through business dealings of varied kinds. Regardless of the level and degree of influence, the tobacco lobby can control a significant amount of legislation that comes its way (Team- Global Issues, 2014). A highly rated skill in management and government alike; decision strategic decision making can be the single advantage or disadvantage in a dynamic environment. This decision requires the commitment of resources as well as will have long term consequences that are not easy to predict.

美国 essay 代 写:烟草游说团体
The conflicting strategic objectives only add to the difficulty a risk associated with the decision making at this level (Eisenhardt & Zbaracki, 1992) (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997).Banning the promotion of Tobacco and tobacco products would affect the revenues through taxes being earned on the product. While existing users would continue to patronize the products, the losses due to the death of older users would not be compensated by new users starting out on the product (Cain, 2014). Turning a blind eye to the situation would mean a toll on the public health mechanism, with more and more persons falling ill from various tobacco related causes. This includes cancer (throat, lung, mouth and so on), asthma, breathing problems, and so on.Banning the promotion Tobacco and tobacco products would affect the prospective sales growth of the products. This in turn would affect the availability of funds for the war chests and social causes being promoted by politicians. Both of them would be depleted and the legislatures would have to look elsewhere for future funding. If they have shared business interests with the members of the tobacco lobby, then they would have to bear significant financial losses as well.