申请文书:伊根的故事描述手法

申请文书:伊根的故事描述手法

作者解释了人们是如何挨饿,如何依靠丝兰的根和道路杀戮为生的。人们甚至做了邪恶的行为,如杀死成千上万只兔子作为食物。吹散和沉降的泥土到处都是,这是一种描述在一个如画的方式。据描述,泥土非常厚,甚至连人都无法在泥土中辨认出来。这本书写得如此之好,以至于作者似乎克制住自己,不愿在与20世纪30年代环境有关的错误步骤之间做出任何公开的类比。另一件好事是,作者没有介入任何政治问题,也没有将沙尘暴的解决或土地的清理归咎于政府。与沙尘暴有关的故事有很多戏剧性的事件。作者在书中生动地描述了目击者和天气(Egan, 2006)。作者已经成功地在一代又一代的故事中产生了许多激动人心的情节。
伊根还在故事中多次使用最高级。“天底下最伟大的草”和“四条腿上最好吃草的动物”等最高级词的使用也增添了对风景的描述之美。作者对纯粹的咆哮进行了有效的描述。起初,伊根把这场灾难描述为一场巨大的灾难。然而,在接近尾声时,他引发了一场辩论,称这场风暴描述了大自然不可逆转的转变,还是干旱的循环?书中明确提出了“这场灾难是否是人类影响的结果”的问题。因此,这本书是一部关于沙尘暴影响生态系统时期人们最糟糕时期的杰作。高平原生态系统的影响是如此之大,以至于从未完全恢复。这本杰出的书受到了世界各地评论家的赞赏,也受到了全世界的好评。

申请文书:伊根的故事描述手法

Author has explained that how the people were starving and lived on yucca roots and road kill. People even did wicked acts such as killing of thousands of rabbits for food. Blowing and settling of dirt all over is yet something which is described in a picturesque manner. It has been described that the dirt was so thick that even the people couldn’t be identified in the dirt. This book has been created so well that the author seems to refrain himself from making any kind of overt parallels between the false steps related to the environment of the 1930’s. Another good thing is that the author do not intrudes into any kind of political issues or blames on the government for settling of the dust bowl or the clearing of land. The story related to the dust bowl has a lot of dramatic incidents. The witness and the weather have been vividly described by the author in the book (Egan, 2006). The author has been successful in the generation of a lot of thrill and excitement in the story.
Egan has also used a number of iterations of superlatives in the story. The use of superlatives such as the “greatest grasses under the heavens” and the “finest grass eating creature on four legs” have also added to the beauty of the description of landscape.The author has given efficient descriptions of the landscape to the pure bluster. Initially, Egan described the disaster as a great disaster in the beginning. However, towards the end, he has swirled a debate that the storms described an irrevocable shift in the nature or was it the cycle of drought? The question ‘if the disaster is as a result of a human impact’ is been clearly raised in the book.Thus, the book is a masterpiece written on the worst time for people during the times when the dust storm had impacted ecosystem. The impact of ecosystem in high plains was such that it was never recovered completely. It is the outstanding book which has received appreciations from critics in different parts of the world and has also received worldwide acclamation.