英语论文代写：社会中介的公共性的讨论
英语论文代写：社会中介的公共性的讨论
Baym和boyd(2012)指出:“驾驭社会中介的公共关系需要新的控制机制和新的技能。“讨论什么是‘社会中介的公共性’，以及作者提到的机制和技巧。把他们的讨论和你自己的个人经历联系起来。当今的社交媒体，如Facebook、Twitter等，使得人类公共生活或社交生活的本质变得复杂。现代互联网技术如何重塑了个人的“公共性”，玷污了“受众”和公众，改变了参与公共生活的意义。网络“公共性”的特征是通过建构而形成的，也是通过社会化媒体的努力而形成的。它还涉及个人的社会背景、身份和习惯。通过社交媒介的公共性之旅，需要所有最新的流程和技术来管理个人的档案，使他/她拥有社交媒体平台的公共生活手段。社交媒体中的公共生活包括个体通过处理模糊的边界、不同形式的个人简介浏览者、不同公众的特征来管理的规律性变化。
英语论文代写：社会中介的公共性的讨论
所有这些机制都是由一个人在他们的社交媒体使用的常规基础上使用的。Harrison和Barthel(2009)认为社交媒体为用户提供了很高的价值。社交媒体认可那些积极利用最新工具和技术来满足个人想象力和参与目的的客户;希望进行上述活动，以便在社交媒体平台上随时向其他用户分发。“媒体”与“公众”永远纠缠不清;因此，作者正确指出的机制不只是利用技术满足他们在社交媒体上最新需求的能力;同时，那些从未接触过像电视这样的媒体的公众现在每天都在利用社交媒体。它涉及到同时对不同媒体技术的策略的深思熟虑的使用。如果社会仲裁模糊了界限，并推动社区和个人分享之间的重新定义，它也敦促重新评估连接“观众”和“公众”的协会。根据Livingstone(2005)的研究，观众通常是一个集体，假设他们与私人领域相关。
英语论文代写：社会中介的公共性的讨论
Baym and boyd (2012) note the following: “Navigating socially mediated publicness requires new mechanisms of control and new skills.” Discuss what is meant by ‘socially mediated publicness’ and the mechanisms and skills that the authors refer to. Connect their discussion to your own personal experiences.The present day’s social media like Facebook, Twitter, etc. have made the nature of public life or social life of human beings complicated. How the modern internet technology has re-shaped the “publicness” of individuals, smudged the “audiences” and publics, and has changed the meaning of being engaged in communal life. The characteristic of online “publicness” is formed by means of construction and also by means of the effort put on by the social media. It also involves an individual’s social background, identities and habits. Journey through the socially mediated publicness requires all the latest processes and technologies in order to manage an individual’s profile so that he / she have a communal life means of the social media platform. The communal life in social media involves regular changes which an individual manages by handling indistinct boundaries, various forms of profile viewers, characteristics of different publics.
英语论文代写：社会中介的公共性的讨论
All this mechanisms are used by a person on a regular basis of their social media usage. According to Harrison and Barthel (2009), social media provides high amount of appreciation to its users. Social media acknowledges clients who aggressively employ the affordances of the latest tools and technologies in order to deal with individual’s own imaginative and involved purposes; the wish of doing the above mentioned activities in order to circulate them to other users available at any point of time on the social media platform. “Media” and ‘‘public’’ have forever been entangled; so the mechanism rightly pointed out by the author is not just the aptitude to utilize technology towards fulfilling their latest needs in the social media; but also the magnitude at which public who at no time had connections to media like television are presently exploiting social media on a daily basis. It involves thoughtful use of strategies commandeering to different media technology at the same time. If social arbitration blurs limits and thrusts redefinition among community and personal sharing, it also urge for re-evaluation of the association linking ‘‘audiences’’ and ‘‘publics.’’ According to Livingstone (2005), audiences have usually been collectives that are correlated hypothetically to the private realm.
