新西兰论文没过：关于创新
新西兰论文没过：关于创新
当一般地考虑创新这个术语时，从组织上下文中来看，它指的是对业务组织的新行为或新想法的采用或创建。事实上，目前关于创新的文献非常多元化，缺乏在一个连贯的理论框架内的整合。组织创新的概念具有许多解释的关键主体性(Naidoo, 2010)。虽然在产业演进的案例研究中，创新被认为是一个突出的特征，但是对于这一问题的系统分析在计算创新过程中所涉及的复杂性方面却面临着典型的失败。从具体意义上说，许多研究并没有对这样一个事实负责，即虽然通过一些创新取得了成功，但大多数研究最终都面临着失败。因此，在死亡和卓越表现方面，创新都会增加额外的机会。大多数组织生存研究的典型论点是创新是组织生存的关键基础。
新西兰论文没过：关于创新
这是因为只有那些有创新能力的组织才有能力建立和保持强大的市场竞争优势。尽管这一论点有其真实性的基础，但只有一种观点被认为是对创新具有主体性和根本不确定性这一观点的忽视。这是在新的世界创新的背景下具体的。在关键后果方面，在成功创新的基础上，利用创新措施对组织生存的研究，偶然地、错误地推断出组织生存与创新之间的正向关系(Lee et al.， 2012)。为了做到这一点，他们面临着失败的会计选择的简单偏差，因此，企业商业化创新的成功也更在生存的范围内。在一定程度上，理解生存与创新之间复杂关系的关键难点在于创新活动的不成功难以观察。
新西兰论文没过：关于创新
When considered generally, the term innovation, from organizational context, is referred to as the adoption or creation of a behavior or idea new for the business organization. The current literature on innovation, as a matter of fact, is extremely diversified and lack integration within a coherent framework of theory. The concept of organizational innovation has key subjectivity with a number of interpretations (Naidoo, 2010). Even though innovation is said to be prominently featured within case studies regarding the evolution of industry, systematic analysis about the issue has faced typical failure in accounting the complications involved in the process of innovation. In the specific sense, a number of researches do not have an accountability about the fact that while there is achievement of success by some innovation, most of them end up facing failure. Thus, there is an increment of exante chances by innovation in terms of both death and exceptional performance. The typical argument placed by majority of the researches on survival of organizations is that innovation is the key fundamental for the survival of organization.
新西兰论文没过：关于创新
This is because only those organizations having the ability of innovating successfully have the ability of establishing and maintaining a strong competitive edge across the market. Even though there is a foundation of truth in this particular argument, there is only one perception considered as there is ignorance of the point that innovation has key subjectivity with the fundamental uncertainty. This is specific in context with new-to- the-world innovation. In terms of the key consequences, research on organizational survival by the use of measures of innovation on the basis of successful innovation end up inferring a positive relationship casually as well as erroneously between organizational survival and innovation (Lee et al., 2012). In order to do so, they face failure in accounting a simple bias of selection and hence, businesses commercializing innovations successfully are also more within the scope of surviving. Partially, the key difficulty to understand the complicated relationship among survival and innovation is involved in the fact that unsuccessful activity of innovation is difficult for observation.
