新西兰论文代写哪家好：微观分析
新西兰论文代写哪家好：微观分析
根据Sargeant et al .(2009),这些因素可以分为3类包括迁移的因素(包括状态的迁移和雇主关系存在与否),农民工的特点(特定的语言、技能水平和教育)和接收条件(社会排斥、监管和保护联盟)在该国(豪厄尔斯,2010)。由于这些因素并不是平均适用于每一个临时工人移徙者，因此存在着导致劣势程度不同的多层次脆弱性。以往的研究侧重于宏观或中观层面的分析，以辅助政治、经济和制度层面的影响分析。从这个角度出发，本文将重点放在微观分析上，检验基于层次脆弱性的澳大利亚园艺具体情境，以识别层次脆弱性的直接原因和政策含义(Deegan, 2008)。本文采用了2013年至2014年一年间分3个阶段进行的实证田野调查数据收集。首先，在维多利亚、塔斯马尼亚和北领地等3个地区开展了广泛的访谈项目。
新西兰论文代写哪家好：微观分析
采收工人随后参与了一个由9个焦点小组和双主持人组成的访谈过程(Hugo, 2001)。来自英国、法国、布隆迪、爱尔兰、香港、意大利、阿富汗、德国、台湾、马来西亚、苏格兰、爱沙尼亚、日本和韩国等国家的64名代表参加了此次活动。除了来自马来西亚、阿富汗和布隆迪的代表外，其他与会者都来自西监测组。在采访中，他们主动提出，他们沉迷于收获各种各样的作物，包括樱桃、苹果、草莓、柑橘、沙拉和混合蔬菜，甚至芒果(Clibborn, 2015)。此外，作者还对劳工、农民、职业介绍所工作人员、背包客旅馆经营者、工会官员、职业健康安全政府机构工作人员、民族社区组织等雇佣的承包商进行了访谈(Underhill et al.， 2015)。
新西兰论文代写哪家好：微观分析
According to Sargeant et al. (2009), such factors can be divided into 3 categories inclusive of migration factors (inclusive of status of migration and whether employer bonding is present or not), characteristics of migrant workers (particular language, level of skill and education) and receiving conditions (social exclusion, protection of regulation and union) in the country (Howells, 2010). As these factors are not evenly applicable to every temporary worker migrant, there is layering of vulnerabilities causing disadvantage to differential degrees. Layered vulnerability previous studies focused over analysis of macro or meson-level for assisting influential analysis at political, economic and institutional level. From this perspective, the article instead focused upon micro-analysing to examine Australian horticulture specific context based layered vulnerability for identifying layered vulnerability immediate causes and the policy implications (Deegan, 2008). The authors in the article adopted empirical fieldwork data collection conducted within 3 phases during span of a year inclusive of 2013 to 2014. Firstly, an extensive program for interviewing was undertaken at 3 region locations inclusive of Victoria, Tasmania and the North Territory.
新西兰论文代写哪家好：微观分析
Harvesting workers were then involved in an interviewing process consisting of 9 focus groups with dual moderators (Hugo, 2001). There were total of 64 participants from countries inclusive of England, France, Burundi, Ireland, Hong Kong, Italy, Afghanistan, Germany, Taiwan, Malaysia, Scotland, Estonia, Japan and South Korea. With exceptions of the ones originating from Malaysia, Afghanistan and Burundi, the participants were from the WHM group. On interview, it came forward that they were indulged in harvesting various crops inclusive of cherries, apples, strawberries, citrus, salad and mixed vegetables and even mangoes (Clibborn, 2015). Additionally, the authors conducted interview with contractors hired by labours, farmers, staff members from employment agencies, operators of backpacker hostel, and officials of union, government agency staff from occupational health and safety and organizations from ethnic community (Underhill et al., 2015).
