新西兰论文代写：美国破产法

新西兰论文代写：美国破产法

过去几年，国际资不抵债的情况一直在上升。为了解决国际破产问题，国际组织和个别国家已采取了一些主动行动。UNICTRAL就是其中之一。个别国家使用单一制和礼让原则制定自己的模态法。美国的《国际破产破产法》(bankruptcy code for international insolvency)采纳了很多来自UNICTRAL and comity clause的指令。Elpida memory案例研究已被用来理解美国破产法的细微差别。最初的改组程序是在东京的法院进行的。2012年，该公司利用东京法院的诉讼程序，试图在美国确立其重组政策。美国法院正式承认法院诉讼程序。然而，美国法院拒绝了某些许可的某些救济和资产出售。埃尔比达成功地获得了法庭程序的承认。由于这一事实，东京法院授权美光科技收购尔必达公司的资产。

新西兰论文代写：美国破产法
在这一特殊情况下，由于美光技术收购了埃尔必达的资产，埃尔必达能够满足债务要求。礼让原则确保了公司内部交易的顺利进行。此案开创了在美国法院获得承认的先例。在分析中探讨了识别后的后续事件。Elpida案例研究发现的一个问题是，债权人和美国债券持有人在当前体系中很脆弱。第15章对外国债务人的救济作了一些规定。美国已修改了破产法，以满足该体系的要求。从作出的判决开始，美国法院如何对待外国代表就开创了先例。对本案作出的判决和所设的先例进行了详细的批判性分析。本研究的结论是，美国破产法有许多积极的指示，而现行破产法有许多救济和援助提供。由于滥用这一制度的情况日益增加，因此对承认和救济有严格的任务规定。

新西兰论文代写：美国破产法

International insolvency has been on the rise in the past few years. To address the issue of international insolvency, a number of initiatives have been taken by international organizations and individual countries. One such initiative is UNICTRAL. Individual countries using UNICTRAL and principles of comity devise their own versions of the Modal law. US bankruptcy code for international insolvency has taken a lot of directives from UNICTRAL and comity clause. Case study of Elpida memory has been used to understand the nuances of the US bankruptcy code. Original restructuring proceedings had taken place in the courts at Tokyo. In 2012, the company using the court proceeding of Tokyo courts had tried to establish its restructuring policy in the United States. The US courts officially recognized courts proceedings. Nevertheless, certain relief and asset sales of certain licensing were denied in the US courts. Elpida was able to successfully gain recognition of the court proceedings. Owing to this fact, the Tokyo court authorized Micron technology to acquire the assets of the Elpida Company.

新西兰论文代写：美国破产法
In this particular case Elpida was able to meet the debt requirements owing to Micron technology acquiring the assets of Elpida. Principles of comity ensured that there was smooth dealing that occurred in the companies. This case has set a precedent of gaining recognition in the US courts. Subsequent events after recognition have been probed in the analysis. Issue that has been identified with the Elpida case study is that creditors and US bondholders are vulnerable in the current system. There are a number of provisions in chapter 15 for relief of the foreign debtor. US bankruptcy code has been changed to meet the demands of the system. From the judgment rendered a precedent was set as to how the US courts deals with the foreign representatives. Critical analysis of the judgment rendered and the precedent set by the case has been probed in detail. This research concludes with the fact that the US bankruptcy code has a number of positive directives and the current code has a lot of relief and assistance to offer. There are strict mandates for recognition and relief owing to the increase in abuse of the system.