新西兰 essay 代 写:故事

新西兰 essay 代 写:故事

在故事中,加布里埃尔和耶利米面临着以欧洲为中心的二元对立。作为一个人,他们正处在一个十字路口。白人的自我和土著的他者混淆了主要的主角。他们试图在这个过程中确立自己的真实身份。他们受父母所教的关于他们的文化和思想过程的西方化的影响。这一点在小说中得到了详细的阐述。随着小说的发展,主人公们被批评失去了他们的本土身份。然而,他们似乎正在获得新的视角,并根据自己的知识做出选择。小说的这一方面得到了探讨。有国家政治治理的影响和所获得的知识。随着小说的发展,读者往往会理解知识的不同维度,以及它如何支持国家的政治范式。智慧、同理心和真知的概念也可以从这个故事情节中理解。故事主线的主人公是在这个过程中认识和发展自己的先天知识的。这种知识的获得使主人公获得了自我意识,在这种情况下,自我意识被认为是真正的力量。
对过程的真知灼见和自我实现应该有更细致入微的理解。在这篇分析中,布鲁克斯注意到柏拉图对权力和知识的立场得到了探究。有人说柏拉图试图理解政治哲学的根源。通过阅读这篇文章,我们可以清楚地看到,柏拉图试图解释理想的政治范式,以及它是如何随着形势的变化而变化的。有一个实际的目的和理想的自我。在这个分析中,柏拉图试图将一个人的理想自我与它如何基于可减轻罪责的环境而改变联系起来。这反映在所获得的知识中。成为理想的想法变成了实践。在这个过程中获得的知识使一个人获得对自己和个人情感的自主权或权力。从个人的角度来看,这被认为是真正的权力。这种力量来自于实现的知识。因此,获得知识的过程导致自我实现和意识,从而导致权力。

新西兰 essay 代 写:故事

In the story, Gabriel and Jeremiah face Eurocentric binary opposition. They are at a crossroads as to who they really are as a person. The white self and the indigenous other confound the main protagonists. They are trying to establish their real identity in the process. They are influenced by what their parents have taught them regarding their culture and the westernization of the thought process. This has been elucidated in detail in the novel. As the novel progresses, the main protagonists are criticized for losing their indigenous identity. However, it seems like they are gaining perspective and making choices based on their knowledge. This aspect of the novel is probed. There is the influence of the political governance of the state and the knowledge that is gained. As the novel progresses, the audience tends to understand the different dimensions of knowledge and how it bolsters towards the political paradigms of the state. The concept of wisdom, empathy and true knowledge can also be understood from this storyline. The main protagonist of the story line is found to understand and develop their innate knowledge in the process. This gaining of the knowledge enables the protagonist to gain self-awareness that has been considered as real power in this situation.
There should be more nuanced understanding of true knowledge and self-realization of the process. In this analysis, Brooks notes that stance of Plato regarding power and knowledge has been probed. It has been stated that Plato tries to understand the roots of political philosophy. From reading the article, it is quite clear that Plato tries to explains about the ideal political paradigm and how it changes based on the situation. There is a practical purpose and the ideal self. In this analysis, there is explanation of how Plato tries to link between the ideal self of a person and how it changes based on the extenuating circumstances. This is reflected in the knowledge gained. The idea of being ideals shift to becoming practices. The knowledge gained in this process makes a person gain autonomy or power over their self and individual emotion. This from a personal standpoint has been considered to be real power. This power stems from the knowledge of realization. Hence, the knowledge gaining process leads to self-realization and awareness which subsequently leads to power.