resume 代写：由于疏忽导致的健康问题
resume 代写：由于疏忽导致的健康问题
当艾伦赶到医院的时候，他的情况已经非常糟糕了。艾伦被骚扰的医生给了不适当的吗啡剂量，导致艾伦的死亡。尽管阿兰受了重伤，本来会死的，但医生还是排除了他活下来的可能性。英国的几项因果关系测试已经剥夺了一位因疏忽而丧失了生存或康复机会的医生对受害病人的康复权。这就是这种情况，直到或除非有代表能够证明，如果医生没有疏忽，病人的情况会更好(Kleinfeld, 2005)。然而，在大多数情况下，生命损失在不到偶数的机会可能不会停止赔偿，因为不管医生的疏忽，病人最终会死亡(斯蒂尔，2008)。一个重要的例子是，一个病人一边去看医生，一边抱怨自己持续咳嗽，后来才发现原来是肺癌。
resume 代写：由于疏忽导致的健康问题
由于疏忽，如果医生未能诊断出肺癌，他将增加癌症扩散的机会，从而进一步降低患者的生存和康复的可能性(Andel, 1984)。然而，考虑到另一种看法，即使医生花时间诊断肺癌，病人的生存和恢复的机会仍然很少，无论如何他都会死去。根据恢复丧失生存机会的权利，允许病人从造成死亡或者减少生存机会的医生那里恢复。尽管已知此类案件考虑的是相同的政策，但在对待证据认定因果标准的几个司法管辖区之间存在不一致性(Matthews, 2009)。在这种特殊的情况下，Alan的妻子也可以起诉Alan工作的公司，因为事故发生在工作场所和工作时间内。
resume 代写：由于疏忽导致的健康问题
By the time Alan rushed to the hospital, he was in an extremely poor condition. Alan was given an inappropriate dose of morphine by the harassed doctor that resulted in the death of Alan. Even though the severe injuries of Alan would have resulted in his death, any chance of survival was eliminated by the doctor. Several tests of causation in the United Kingdom have denied the right of recovery for an aggrieved patient from a doctor who delivered negligent deprivation in the chance of survival or recovery. This is such scenario, until or unless it can be proved by the representative that the patient had been better if the physician had not been negligent (Kleinfeld, 2005). However, under majority of the cases, the loss of life in less than even chance might not withhold compensation, as irrespective of the negligence of the doctor, the patient would have ended up dying anyways (Steele, 2008). As a significant example, a patient visits doctor while complaining about persistent cough that later on turns out to be lung cancer.
resume 代写：由于疏忽导致的健康问题
Out of negligence, if the doctor fails in diagnosing the lung cancer, he will increase the chances of spreading cancer that will further decrease the probability of survival and recovery of the patient (Andel, 1984). However, considering a different perception, even if the doctor took time in diagnosing the lung cancer, there would have still been few chances for the survival and recovery of the patient, and he would have died anyways.As per the right of recovering for the loss of chance of survival, a patient is allowed to recover from a doctor who has ended up causing a loss or reduced the chance of survival. Even though such cases are known to have the consideration of the same policy, there is an existence of inconsistencies among several jurisdiction treating the causative standard for identifying evidence (Matthews, 2009). In this particular scenario, Alan’s wife can also sue the company in which Alan was working as the accident took place within the premises of the work place and during working hours.
