课程代写:和约法

课程代写:和约法

根据《合伙法》,约翰、保罗、乔治和林戈拥有布里斯班市建筑师事务所Quarrymen Designs Architects (QDA)的所有权。他们四个人都参与了公司的创立。现在根据公司协议,John可以为公司进行QDA采购,因此根据公司成员授权的协议,John可以参与采购,金额为$50,000。保罗负责采石场,乔治负责客户,林戈负责建筑服务。(问题1)在此背景下,现在为合作伙伴确定的法律问题是Ringo,他现在只是体系结构服务业务的一部分,仅为体系结构服务保留。而在没有其他参与利润支付的情况下,也应该考虑为公司偿债。(问题2)约翰是负责采购管理的人,他只允许购买价值不超过5万美元的商品。那么现在他已经购买了价值9万美元的货物,约翰是否应该被认为违反了协议义务,以及它如何改变了责任状况。第三个问题:乔治在赌博,为了付清欠款,他开了一家NADS公司。

课程代写:和约法
他在家为他的第二家公司工作,有时也把工作带到办公室。现在有指控称,他一直在利用QDA的前客户从事自己的业务,并获得了大约5万美元的利润。这违反了信托责任吗?根据1891年合伙法案,有不同类型的合伙关系被认可有普通合伙关系,特大合伙关系,有限责任合伙关系,和股份有限合伙关系。在一般合伙关系中,合伙人不承担任何形式的有限责任。除另有明确规定外,所有合伙人均有责任。另一方面,超大规模的合作关系是允许20个或更多的数字组成。在有限责任合伙企业中,必须注册有两种形式的合伙企业,如普通合伙人和有限合伙人。在普通合伙人的情况下,有无限的责任,在有限合伙人的情况下,责任只存在于该合伙人带入企业的资本。在合伙企业中,每个合伙人都是其他合伙人的委托人或代理人。他们彼此负有受托人的义务。

课程代写:和约法

According to the partnership Act John, Paul, George and Ringo have ownership of the architect business Quarrymen Designs Architects (QDA) in Brisbane city. All four of them are involved in starting the firm. Now under the firm agreement, John can make QDA purchases for the firm, and hence as per the agreement is authorized by the firm members to participate in purchases to the amount of $50,000. Paul looks after quarries, George the clients and Ringo provides architectural service with annual retainer. (Issue 1) In this context, the legal issues that are identified for the partnership now are that of whether Ringo, who now is part of the business only for architecture service and is retained for architecture services alone. And with no other participation in the profit payment, should also be considered in the debt payments for the company.(Issue 2) John is the one who had taken up the management of purchases and is cleared to make purchases only up to the value of $50,000.So now that he has purchased up to the value of $90,000 should John be considered, as having been in breach of agreement duties and how does it change the liability situation. (Issue 3) Thirdly George is gambling and has started a company NADS, in order to settle his dues.

课程代写:和约法
He works from home for his second company and sometimes brings the work to the office too. It is now alleged that he has been using former clients of QDA in his business, and has made around 50,000$ profits. Is this a breach of fiduciary duty? Now according to the Partnership Act 1891, there are different types of partnerships that are recognized which are that of the general partnerships, outsize partnerships, Limited Liability partnerships, and incorporated partnerships. Now in the context of general partnerships, the partners do not enjoy any form of limited liability. All partners are liable unless otherwise expressly stated. On the other hand, an outsize partnership is one in which 20 numbers and more are allowed to form. In the case of the limited liability partnerships, the partnerships have to be registered with there being two forms of partnerships such as that general and the limited partners. In the case of the general partners, there is unlimited liability and in the case of the limited partners, liability only exists for the capital that such a partner has brought into the business.In a partnership, every partner will act as a principal or as an agent for the other partners. They owe fiduciary duties to one another.