代写：内部合同制度
代写：内部合同制度
古代英美地区实行的是内部合同制度，特别是始于军械库生产，需要专业知识。理论的起源有多种原因,其中之一是知识贫困资本家必须有力的合同产品的生产甚至大规模生产这些内部承包商将雇佣工匠和供应所有的必需品,地方,原材料、车间、工资、承包商和合同费用。制度有它自己的回报，工匠或工人被认为比资本家更有知识，并最终可能收取他自己的费用，但随着资本主义更强大的概念的出现，不能长久地坚持这种权力。
代写：内部合同制度
工业革命将工厂系统推向工厂系统，然后改变了一切，所有者、资本家、企业家与工人的关系更加稳定，并转变为一种固定的操作系统。本文认为，内部合同制度对那些能够控制工资、最终能够战胜知识贫乏的资本家的工人有其自身的好处。但是，随着资本主义制度在世界范围内的蔓延，被视为有形利益的资本主义制度在知识方面失去了看似权威的地位，并屈服于工业革命和工厂制度的到来。本文论述了内部合同工的优势和制度的合法性，这种制度如果长期存在，就可以使他们与资本家平起平坐。
代写：内部合同制度
Inside contract system was practiced in the ancient American and British regions which especially started with the armoury production requiring specialised knowledge. The origin of the theory had multiple reasons, one of which was the knowledge poor capitalist who had to forcefully contract the production and even mass production of products to these inside contractors who would then hire craftsmen and supply all the necessities, place, raw materials, workshop, wages, and contractual fees to the contractor. The system had its own rewards where the craftsmen or the worker was considered knowledge rich than the capitalist, and could eventually and possibly charge his own rates, but with the dawn of the notion of capitalist being more powerful could not cling to that authority for long.
代写：内部合同制度
The industrial revolution which pushed the workshop system to factory system then changed everything and the relationship of the owner, capitalist, entrepreneur with the workers was more stabilised and converted to a fixed system of operations. This essay argues that inside contract system had its own benefits to workers who could control their wages and could have eventually overpowered the knowledge-poor capitalists. But with the capitalistic system being spreading worldwide and to be considered as a tangible gain lost its seemingly authoritative position in terms of knowledge, and gave in to the advent of industrial revolution and factory system. The essay presents the advantages of inside contract workers and the legitimacy of the system which on its persistence for a longer period could have made them equivalent to the capitalists, though it has its own flipsides too which will also be discussed here.
