代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
本篇代写论文主要讲的是不同国家之间的法律是不同的，哪怕是相同性质的案件，但判决却不一样。下面来看看我们新西兰高阶论文代写网的写作。
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
然而，在中国的立法中却没有考虑因素。以1984年天津市中级人民法院李敏诉朱金华、李绍华一案为例。在上述情况下，意图的表现具有重要意义，但不考虑。只有在涉及财产的情况下才接受单方面的法律立场。与德国法不同，单方法律立场不是单方承诺，而是一种带有要约和承诺等要素的单方合同。然而，这一标准只涉及可被视为财产的东西所提供的报酬。
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
在所有其他情况下，意图的表现比任何其他情况都重要。德国立法是否适合中国法院遵循的标准?再次与英国立法相似，德国法院也没有非常严格的适用标准。就德国立法第657 BGB节而言，虽然接受了承诺的立场，但将考虑道德和法律要求等因素。奖励条件的形成和接受的性质因此被给予一些考虑。所以基于德国的法律立场，灵活性的提供是基于语境的。
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
虽然标准是单方承诺，法院仍然给予法律争议下的情形应有的价值，这意味着要约人或承诺人将有机会辩论他为什么必须撤销承诺。因此，中国法律也不应完全接受单边承诺。单边承诺的接受将使中国法律僵化。它需要根据案例的上下文灵活。本文通过与现有国际法律视角的比较，从中国法律视角对报酬广告的性质进行了批判性的分析。
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
本研究比较分析了中国法、英国法和德国法等不同法律体系中报酬广告所涉及的不同法律要素。规范意义上的广告是指广告要约人发出的一种信息形式。从商业意义上讲，这是一种付费交流。就索取报酬的广告而言，该广告是由要约人制作的，声明他或她会奖赏完成广告所要求的工作的人。当涉及到报酬广告时，中国的法律观点似乎采取了双重立场。
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
However, the element of consideration is not present in the case of Chinese legislation. Consider the case of Li Min v. Zhu Jinhua and Li Shao Hua, Tian Jin Intermediate People’s Court, 1984. The manifestation of intent is given significance but not the consideration in the above case. The unilateral juristic standpoint is accepted only in those cases involving property. Unlike the German law the unilateral juristic standpoint is not a unilateral promise, but is a unilateral contract with such elements as offer and acceptance associated with it. However, this standardization is with respect to only rewards offered for something that could be considered as property.
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
In all others the manifestation of intent is given importance over any other.Is the German legislation an appropriate standard to follow by Chinese Courts? Once again similar to the UK legislation, the German court also does not have a very stringent application of criteria. In the case of the German Legislation Section 657 BGB, although the promise standpoint is accepted, there will be consideration given to such elements as moral and legal claim. The nature in which the reward condition is made and accepted is hence given some consideration. So based on the German legal standpoint once again, flexibility is offered based on the context.
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
Although the standard is the unilateral promise, the courts still give the situation under legal contestation the due merit, meaning the offeror or the promisor would be given the chance to argue on why he has to rescind a promise. So Chinese law should not accept the unilateral promise completely either. The acceptance of the unilateral promise will make the Chinese law rigid. It needs to be flexible based on the context of the cases.The Thesis critically analyzed the nature of advertisement for reward from the Chinese law perspective by comparing it with existing international legal perspectives.
代写论文：不同国家之间法律的差异
The research was conducted as a comparative analysis of the different legal elements involved in advertisement for a reward from the different legal systems such as the Chinese law, the UK law and the German law. An advertisement in a normative sense is one that is to be considered as a form of information sent out by an offeror of the advertisement. In commercial sense, it is a paid communication. In the case of an advertisement for a reward, the advertisement is made out by the offeror stating that he or she will reward the person who completes what is expected of them as stated in the advertisement. The Chinese legal perspective seems to take up a dual stance when it comes to advertisements for reward.
